Review | Lectin-Free Diet: Nov 2023 – Feb 2025

I am neither a doctor nor a researcher, and I lack expertise in medicine or healthcare. I am simply an ordinary citizen. My practice of the lectin-free diet is based on Dr. Steven R. Gundry’s books, “The Plant Paradox” and “Gut Check.” For a detailed understanding of the theory, I encourage you to refer to these books.

At present, I am following Phase 2. In line with the book’s recommendations, I am avoiding rushing into Phase 3. Until my symptoms—such as allergies, neuralgia, arthritis, and chronic sinusitis—improve further, I intend to adhere strictly to the Phase 2 dietary guidelines. For more details, I highly recommend reading the book.

Dietary Considerations:

Carbohydrate Restriction: To avoid blood sugar spikes, I am carefully limiting carbohydrate intake. For example, as of 10 February, I still have leftover New Year’s mochi. In previous years, I would consume an entire box within three days, but this year, I am restricting myself to two pieces per meal.

Consumption of High-Quality Fats: To promote fat metabolism, I am incorporating quality fats into my diet while ensuring I consume the necessary minerals to support mitochondrial function.

Fibre Intake: As a Japanese individual, I actively include seaweed in my diet.

Selection of Animal Protein: Following Dr. Gundry’s guidelines, I consume wild-caught fish, with occasional meat and eggs.

Dairy Products: I opt for goat’s cheese when available. Although expensive, it is a delicious choice.

Avoidance of Additives: To protect my kidneys, I minimise my intake of food additives.

Lectin-Free Practice: Avoiding lectins is a fundamental rule I strictly adhere to.

Fruit Restriction: Due to carbohydrate limitations, I consume fruit only a few times a month. While avocados are costly, I would like to include them in my salads.

Lifestyle Adjustments:

Beyond diet, I have realised the importance of getting more than eight hours of sleep, maintaining a regular routine, and engaging in moderate exercise. While challenging, I aim to incorporate these habits into my daily life.

Changes in Meal Patterns:

My mum, 81-year-old, who has schizophrenia, is responsible for meal preparation in our household. Due to her declining health, our meal frequency has reduced to two per day since last year. To compensate for the lost meal, I snack on nuts to supplement my intake of healthy fats. With the winter cold further affecting my mum’s health, preparing elaborate meals has become difficult. I hope to cook buri daikon and miso oden with her at least once this winter.

Achievements and Health Improvements:

Significant Reduction in Chronic Inflammation: Severe pain and inflammation have diminished, greatly improving my quality of life. My need for painkillers has completely disappeared, and joint pain has nearly resolved.

Improved Well-being: Brain fog has almost cleared, my skin has improved, and I no longer require sleeping aids. My weight has stabilised, and I am finding a better balance in my food intake before and after exercise. My gut condition has improved, evident in changes in my bowel movements, exactly as described in the book. The reduction of harmful gut bacteria and the increase in beneficial bacteria appear to be taking effect.

A Copernican Shift:

Surprisingly, I can live without rice without any issues. It makes me question the significance of Japan’s 2,000-year history of rice cultivation. My perspective has completely shifted.

Nutritional Realisation: Naturally, muscle and weight will not increase without strength training. However, through daily tracking of my weight and body fat, I have realised that the amount of protein required for muscle growth drastically decreases once gut health improves. My digestive absorption has enhanced. This aligns with what the book suggests. Looking back, my struggle to consume 100–140g of protein daily seems unnecessary. I spent so much on protein supplements, amino acids, milk, and yoghurt—only to discover that much less was required. This truly feels like a Copernican shift in my understanding of nutrition.

Dietary Challenges and Expenses:

Increased Food Costs: Eating healthily is expensive. Ironically, those looking to lose weight must spend more money to reduce fat. While I have cut down on expenses related to amino acids and protein supplements, my grocery bills remain high, and I feel the financial strain.

Guideline Adherence: I was unable to fully comply with recommendations regarding water, meat, and eggs. Dr. Gundry advises avoiding meat and eggs from grain-fed livestock, but in Japan, it is nearly impossible to find pork, beef, chicken, or eggs that do not come from grain-fed sources.

Water Issues: The guidelines recommend tap water, but the tap water in my old apartment is not drinkable. I purchase mineral water, selecting brands that resemble the water quality of my hometown, the Rokko Mountain range.

Conclusion:

The lectin-free diet has significantly improved my health, transforming my life by reducing pain and inflammation, improving sleep quality, and enhancing digestion. However, increased food costs remain a challenge, and I hope to expand my repertoire of meals. While it is difficult to adhere perfectly to the guidelines, I believe that true freedom lies within these constraints. To safeguard my health, I will continue this journey with enthusiasm. I hope everyone on the Fediverse will continue to watch over me with warmth and encouragement.

Supported by ChatGPT

The Analects of Confucius

Though not a part of my family’s teachings, a passage from the Analects of Confucius has nevertheless shaped me profoundly.
Written in ancient Chinese over 2,000 years ago, the original text is complex, with interpretations varying across different editions. These differences are especially notable between the Japanese and English translations.
In my readings of the Analects, I have always focused on comparing several translations by different scholars, deepening my understanding with each version. However, I acknowledge that I am still far from fully grasping and embodying its teachings.
I intend to continue revisiting the text, hoping that its lessons will gradually become ingrained in me, like blood and flesh. It is a book I will learn from throughout my life.

Below is a passage that resonates with me deeply.


Book 1: Learning and Practising

1. The Master said, “Study, and at the proper time, revise—it is indeed a joy to the heart! With every revision, your understanding deepens, and you continue to improve.”

4. Zengzi said:
“I examine my conduct repeatedly each day:
When considering the needs of others, have I acted with a genuine heart?
In my associations with friends, have I been sincere?
And when sharing knowledge, have I truly understood it, or have I merely parroted it?”


Source: Iwanami Bunko Edition, annotated by Osamu Kanaya.

Supported by ChatGPT

Recipe for Sanbaizu

Sanbaizu is not only delicious, but also packed with health benefits that help maintain your well-being and energize you from the inside. It’s a condiment we incorporate into our daily meals for its positive effects, and it’s also a perfect choice for those avoiding lectins!

Ingredients:

  • Soy sauce (light soy sauce): 4 tablespoons
  • Mirin (hon-mirin): 4 tablespoons
  • Black vinegar (Gifu-produced black vinegar): 4 tablespoons

Instructions:

  1. In a bowl, combine 4 tablespoons of soy sauce, mirin, and black vinegar.
  2. Mix thoroughly, and it’s ready to serve!

Since this recipe doesn’t require heating, the flavors of the condiments remain intact. If you wish to remove the alcohol from the mirin, cover the bowl with plastic wrap and microwave it for 30 seconds to 1 minute at 500W. This will gently enhance the sweetness of the mirin.

Quality Condiments Are Key to Delicious Cooking Using only the highest quality soy sauce, mirin, and black vinegar is the secret to my cooking. When you choose the finest ingredients for your everyday condiments, the depth and umami of your dishes improve dramatically. Investing in quality condiments not only makes your meals tastier but also has a positive effect on your health.

Even if the ingredients cost more, I believe they are worth the investment. We save money in other areas of life but never skimp on the quality of our cooking. We prioritize investing in our meals, and that mindset is essential to our household. Spending on premium ingredients enriches our daily meals and nourishes our hearts.

Health Benefits of Sanbaizu Sanbaizu combines black vinegar, mirin, and soy sauce, each offering excellent nutritional value and health benefits.

  • Black vinegar is rich in amino acids, B vitamins, and citric acid. It helps with fatigue recovery, promotes metabolism, and improves blood circulation. It also works to balance the gut microbiota, aids digestion, and supports overall health. Additionally, black vinegar’s antioxidant properties boost immunity and help prevent aging.
  • Mirin adds natural sweetness without using sugar, thanks to the fermentation of rice and koji. It’s packed with umami, amino acids, and B vitamins, and helps with digestion. Even without heating, it gives a mellow sweetness, adding depth to your cooking.
  • Soy sauce (especially light soy sauce) is lower in salt, enhances the natural flavor of ingredients, and provides a refined umami. Tatsuno’s light soy sauce is low-sodium but still offers rich flavor, promoting a healthy diet.

Additional Health-Boosting Ingredients for Sanbaizu Adding these ingredients to Sanbaizu can amplify its health benefits:

  • Extra virgin olive oil (cold-pressed) is rich in polyphenols with strong antioxidant properties, supporting cardiovascular health. It improves blood flow and is effective in preventing arteriosclerosis. The oleic acid in olive oil helps lower bad cholesterol and maintain healthy cholesterol levels.
  • Black pepper promotes metabolism and aids fat burning, thanks to piperine. Combined with ground sesame seeds, which are high in antioxidant sesamin, this combination boosts digestion and immunity.
  • Ground sesame is rich in B vitamins and minerals, which assist energy production and contribute to the health of your skin and hair.

References:

  • Doi, A., et al. (2017). “Health benefits of black vinegar.” Journal of Functional Foods, 28, 23-35.
    Research on the health benefits of black vinegar, discussing its effects on fatigue recovery and metabolism.
  • Fernández, M. L., et al. (2019). “Health benefits of olive oil.” Nutrients, 11(8), 1795.
    A review of the health effects of extra virgin olive oil.
  • Yamada, M., et al. (2016). “Nutritional value of sesame seeds and their effects on health.” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 62(4), 235-240.
    A study on the nutritional value and health benefits of sesame seeds.
  • Ríos, J. L., et al. (2018). “Health benefits of black pepper.” Phytotherapy Research, 32(7), 1225-1231.
    A study on the health benefits of black pepper, particularly its effects on fat burning and metabolism.

Supported by ChatGPT

Our Heroes, Our Turn to Give Back

Learning about the Operation Tomodachi lawsuit hit me hard. The very soldiers who came to our aid have suffered radiation exposure and now endure chronic health issues. I’m ashamed I didn’t know this sooner.

Back then, in the wake of the disaster, we lived in constant fear. Yet, their courage moved us beyond words. Eighty years ago, Japan and the US were locked in brutal battles across the Pacific. But we overcame that bloodshed and became friends—true friends. It felt like we had set an example for a world still trapped in cycles of war and hatred.

And now, those very soldiers are suffering. Knowing this, how can we stand by and do nothing? Fukushima cannot remain a perpetual victim, forever on the receiving end of aid. It’s my turn. This time, we give back.

The US lacks a universal healthcare system like Japan’s. Medical costs are crippling—are these soldiers getting the care they need? If radiation exposure forced them out of service, what became of their lives? Their families?

First, I need to gather information and assess what can be done. Perhaps a crowdfunding campaign, reaching out to those who were helped in 2011, channelling support through aid organisations to cover medical expenses and daily needs. There must be something we can do.

They stood by us when we needed them most. Now, it’s our turn to stand by them.
Another mission has found its way into my life.

Operation Tomodachi

Operation Tomodachi was a large-scale humanitarian aid and disaster relief operation conducted by the United States military in response to the Great East Japan Earthquake, which struck on March 11, 2011.

Overview of the Operation
Duration: March 12, 2011 – May 4, 2011
Participating Units:
U.S. Forces in Japan (U.S. Navy 7th Fleet, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Army)
Fleet centred around the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan
Approximately 24,000 U.S. military personnel
About 24 ships and 140 aircraft

Primary Activities:
Transportation of supplies (food, water, medical supplies, fuel, etc.) to the affected areas
Search and rescue operations for missing persons
Debris removal and recovery support
Monitoring and assisting with the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant crisis

Main Support Activities
1.Support from USS Ronald Reagan

Immediately following the earthquake, the 7th Fleet responded swiftly at the request of the Japanese government.
The USS Ronald Reagan deployed to the waters off the coast of Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures, where it conducted helicopter missions to transport relief supplies.
U.S. military aircraft carried out air bridges, delivering water, food, blankets, and fuel to the affected regions.


2.Marine Corps Landing and Support Operations

The U.S. Marine Corps (including the 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force based in Okinawa) landed on the coastlines of Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures to deliver supplies and engage in recovery work.


3.U.S. Air Force and Army Transport Operations

C-130 transport planes and helicopters were used to airlift supplies to isolated regions.
Army units provided infrastructure and road recovery support.

4.Support for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Crisis

Unmanned aerial systems were employed to monitor radiation levels.
U.S. personnel assisted with the injection of cooling water.
Radiation data was collected in the vicinity of Fukushima.


Challenges and Issues
Exposure of U.S. Military Personnel
Some members of the crew aboard USS Ronald Reagan, who operated off the coast of Fukushima, were exposed to radiation.
Subsequently, several of these personnel filed lawsuits seeking compensation from Tokyo Electric Power Company, claiming health issues related to the exposure (the “Tomodachi Operation lawsuit”).


References(Japanese Sources)
Nobuyuki Miura, The East Japan Earthquake and the U.S.-Japan Cooperation in Disaster Relief: Focusing on Operation Tomodachi in The Report of the Disaster Prevention and Emergency Relief Institute, Kokushikan University, Vol. 3, 2011.
Koichi Isobe, The Frontlines of Operation Tomodachi: Lessons Learned from U.S.-Japan Alliance Cooperation in the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Crisis, Sayurusha, 2019.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, U.S. Military Support for the Great East Japan Earthquake (Operation Tomodachi), August 29, 2011.

References(U.S. Sources)
U.S. Air Force Historical Support Division, 2011 Operation Tomodachi
U.S. Department of Defense, Operation Tomodachi – Japan Tsunami Relief Operations
U.S. Department of Defense, LOOKBACK: Operation Tomodachi (media.defense.gov)

The Tomodachi Operation Lawsuit

The “Tomodachi Operation Lawsuit” concerns the legal action taken by U.S. military personnel, who, after the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011, were exposed to radiation while assisting with the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. These servicemen filed a lawsuit against Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), seeking compensation for health damage.

Background
In the aftermath of the disaster, the United States military swiftly initiated “Operation Tomodachi”, which included the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier “USS Ronald Reagan” operating off the coast of Fukushima. However, complications arose when the ship took in contaminated water, which was processed by its water filtration systems, resulting in radiation exposure to some of the crew.

The Lawsuit’s Progression
In December 2012, eight servicemen filed a lawsuit in a federal court in California. The number of plaintiffs subsequently grew to around 400 by 2020.
Their claim was straightforward: TEPCO underestimated the effects of the radiation, failing to provide adequate information. They further argued that exposure to the radiation had caused severe health issues, including cancer, thyroid disorders, and infertility, and sought compensation exceeding $1 billion (approximately 150 billion yen).

Legal Developments
TEPCO has denied the existence of a causal link between the radiation exposure and the health damage, asserting that no such direct connection has been proven. The Japanese government has also maintained that the radiation levels were not harmful.
In 2020, the California court decided to continue the trial, though no final verdict has yet been reached.

Impacts and Debate
Relations between the U.S. Military and the Japanese Government
Initially, both the Japanese government and the U.S. military downplayed the risks of radiation exposure. However, this lawsuit has brought the health risks into sharper focus.

Health Damages to U.S. Military Personnel
Many of the servicemen involved in the lawsuit suffer from severe health conditions, with support organisations actively campaigning for compensation.

Responsibility of Tokyo Electric Power Company
The Fukushima Daiichi disaster remains the subject of numerous lawsuits both domestically and internationally, with this case becoming a key point of scrutiny in determining the responsibility of TEPCO.

References(Japanese Sources)
“Drifting Tomodachi: The Lawsuit of U.S. Radiation Victims” (By Masato Tainaka, Iwanami Shoten)
“Examining the Issues of Nuclear Damage Compensation Law” (By Ken Mizuno, Japan Energy Law Research Institute)
“Ten Years After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident” (OECD Nuclear Energy Agency)

References (U.S. Sources)
Operation Tomodachi Registry (U.S. Department of Defense)
“Operation Tomodachi” (U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps)
“Guidance for Clinicians on Service Members Who Served in Operation Tomodachi” (U.S. Navy Environmental Health Center)

Supported by ChatGPT

The Roots of Suffering: Ignorance, Delusion, and Wrong View in Buddhist Philosophy

This is my personal admonition:Ignorance (avidya) and delusion (mūnyō) manifest as the veils that obscure our perception of truth, steering us toward suffering. The concept of “wrong view” (jaken) refers to perceiving the world in a misguided way, often at odds with reality. These erroneous views spring from ignorance or delusion, leading to misapprehensions about causality, the nature of phenomena, and the adoption of false beliefs.

Ignorance is the absence of knowledge, while delusion represents the failure to grasp the truth. Conversely, wrong view signifies the state of holding misguided beliefs, whether intentionally or unknowingly. An example of this is the false belief that “happiness can be attained through wealth.” Such views only serve to reinforce actions and judgments rooted in illusion and misunderstanding.

In essence: ignorance is “not knowing,” delusion is “losing sight of the truth,” and wrong view is “holding distorted perceptions.”

These teachings are grounded in several Buddhist scriptures, each offering insights into the interconnected nature of these concepts:

The Lotus Sutra
This scripture expounds on how wrong views, delusion, and ignorance serve as the root causes of suffering. It specifically addresses the “Four Wrong Views” (shijaken), providing a clear understanding of how these erroneous perspectives shape our experience.

The Pure Land Sutra
Here, the emphasis is placed on ignorance and delusion as the primary sources of suffering. The path to liberation is offered through the rebirth in the Pure Land, where one can overcome these afflictions and attain enlightenment.

The Alaya-Vijnana Sutra
Through the concept of Alaya-Vijnana (the “storehouse consciousness”), this sutra illuminates how ignorance and delusion infiltrate the mind, fostering wrong views and misleading perceptions.

The Madhyamaka Karika (Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way)
In this profound text, Nāgārjuna offers a theoretical analysis of how delusion, wrong views, and defilements lead beings astray, reinforcing their suffering. It further highlights how ignorance obstructs the path to liberation, particularly through the doctrine of emptiness (śūnyatā).

These scriptures intimately weave together the concepts of delusion, ignorance, and wrong view, positioning them as fundamental sources of suffering within Buddhist philosophy.

Supported by ChatGPT

The Gray Rhino Strikes:Our Millennia-Long Responsibility

If a caldera eruption were to occur in proximity to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, the consequences would be nothing short of catastrophic. The volcanic ash would not merely fall upon the surrounding regions of Fukushima, obstructing the cooling mechanisms of the nuclear reactors, but the fusion of radioactive materials with the ash would exacerbate the risk of widespread dispersion. In such a scenario, it is highly probable that nations across the Northern Hemisphere would face direct repercussions, rendering them far from unaffected.

Dispersal of Radioactive Materials
Should a nuclear accident transpire, radioactive substances such as iodine, caesium, and strontium would be released into the atmosphere, and owing to prevailing wind patterns and atmospheric conditions, these materials would disperse over vast expanses. With strong winds or atmospheric disturbances in play, radioactive substances could travel hundreds of kilometres. In the most extreme of circumstances, the effects could reach across the entire Northern Hemisphere, with regions experiencing high concentrations of radiation potentially being impacted even thousands of kilometres from the source. The IAEA’s reports have outlined the trajectory of radioactive materials and the influence of meteorological conditions on such dispersion (source: IAEA, Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, 2011).

The Scope of Impact
In the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, radioactive materials were carried throughout Europe and North America due to prevailing winds. Within mere days of the incident, radiation spread to regions thousands of kilometres away, with particularly severe effects in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and parts of Western Europe. Thus, in the worst-case scenario, radioactive materials could be dispersed across the entire Northern Hemisphere, leading to widespread contamination and severe radiation exposure.

Risk of Acute Radiation Exposure
As radioactive materials spread over such vast distances, the risk of acute radiation exposure becomes alarmingly significant, particularly for neighbouring countries or even distant continents. If radiation were to descend in concentrated doses, regions exposed to over several hundred millisieverts could witness residents suffering from acute radiation sickness, manifesting as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and immune system deficiencies. According to IAEA guidelines, health effects become apparent with exposure to more than 100 millisieverts of radiation (source: IAEA, Safety of Nuclear Reactors, 2018), and in the direst of circumstances, these effects could manifest over vast swathes of the globe, leading to extensive health consequences across the Northern Hemisphere.

The Risk of Caldera Eruptions in Japan
Japan, an archipelago blessed with many active volcanoes, faces an especially dire risk from caldera volcanoes, capable of causing catastrophic damage. Historical records reveal frequent caldera eruptions, particularly in the Kyushu region, where the Aso and Kikai calderas pose significant risks of re-eruption. Furthermore, caldera volcanoes are also found in the Tohoku and Hokkaido regions, where large eruptions have occurred in the past.

Indeed, the caldera risk in the vicinity of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant epitomises the “gray rhino” phenomenon.
The “gray rhino” metaphor, coined in the work The Gray Rhino: How to Recognize and Act on the Obvious Dangers We Ignore (2016) by economist Michele Wucker, explores the theme of how societies tend to overlook imminent and conspicuous risks—represented by the “gray rhino”—until they become insurmountable crises. She underscores the challenge of recognising and responding to unavoidable dangers that we too often ignore (source: Michele Wucker, The Gray Rhino: How to Recognize and Act on the Obvious Dangers We Ignore, 2016).

According to research conducted by Professor Yoshiyuki Tatsumi and Associate Professor Keiko Suzuki at the Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, the likelihood of a caldera eruption of significant magnitude within the Japanese archipelago in the next century is approximately 1% (source: Kobe University, KOBE-U.AC.JP).
This study was published in the Proceedings of Japan Academy, Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences on November 11, 2014 (source: Kobe University, KOBE-U.AC.JP).
For further details on this research, please refer to the press release by Kobe University.

Long-Term Management of Radioactive Waste
Amid the ongoing decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, the management of radioactive materials with exceptionally long half-lives, such as Plutonium-239 (Pu-239), over an astonishing period of approximately 24,000 years, presents an unfathomable challenge. Within this vast timespan, humanity will inevitably face numerous natural disasters and unforeseen risks. The caldera eruption risk surrounding Fukushima Daiichi stands as the quintessential embodiment of the “gray rhino.”

Should such a massive caldera eruption transpire, the resultant volcanic ash and radioactive materials would merge, dispersing contamination over vast territories. Were this risk to materialise, the management of the radioactive waste at Fukushima Daiichi would become all the more challenging, triggering further health risks and environmental repercussions. This scenario would only serve to underscore the complexity and difficulty of managing safety over the long term, placing a profound and enduring responsibility on future generations across millennia.

Thus, risk management surrounding Fukushima Daiichi is not merely a contemporary issue but a monumental responsibility extending far into the future, encompassing multiple generations and demanding our collective foresight and action.

Supported by ChatGPT

Neglecting this issue is not an option.

The Reality of Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning – Is This Merely Japan’s Concern?
The decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant is projected to take 30 to 40 years. This process entails the removal of spent nuclear fuel, the dismantling of structures, and the reduction of radiation levels—an undertaking of immense complexity and duration. However, throughout this period, the risk of a catastrophic accident remains ever-present.

How many people truly acknowledge this reality?

The extraction of spent nuclear fuel from storage pools and the dismantling of damaged infrastructure are particularly hazardous operations, conducted under extreme radiation exposure and harsh conditions. Furthermore, the risks involved today may well exceed those of the previous disaster.

Within the ruined reactor cores, vast quantities of highly radioactive molten fuel debris (corium) remain inaccessible. These materials emit radiation so intense that mere exposure could prove fatal. The very act of attempting to remove them introduces a precarious scenario:

What if complications arise during fuel retrieval?
What if an unforeseen earthquake or tsunami strikes once again?
The 2011 disaster resulted in the widespread dissemination of radioactive contaminants through the atmosphere and the ocean, impacting nations far beyond Japan’s borders. To this day, treated but still radioactive water continues to be released into the Pacific.

Is this truly a distant issue of no concern to the rest of the world?

Despite advancements in risk management, absolute safety remains unattainable. Should global attention wane, the next accident could surpass the scale of Fukushima.

This is not merely Japan’s predicament.
This is a matter that concerns the future of us all.

Sources
The concerns outlined above are substantiated by multiple authoritative sources:

1.Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)
TEPCO provides periodic updates on the decommissioning process and ongoing challenges.

2.Japanese Government (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Nuclear Regulation Authority)
Reports on decommissioning strategy and risk assessments.

3.International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Provides global assessments of Fukushima’s decommissioning and its associated risks.

4.Academic Research and Expert Analyses
Numerous studies from institutions such as Kyoto University and the University of Tokyo highlight the extreme challenges posed by molten fuel debris and long-term contamination risks.

5.Media Reports (NHK, The Guardian, BBC, Asahi Shimbun, etc.)
In-depth investigative journalism on Fukushima’s decommissioning progress and the ongoing risk of another nuclear catastrophe.

Supported by ChatGPT

Fukushima and the Future: My Standpoint

My political and ideological position on Fukushima, nuclear power, and atomic energy.

I am neither fundamentally anti-nuclear nor an anti-government activist, nor do I seek to replace the ruling Liberal Democratic Party. At present, I hold no political stance advocating changes to Japan’s nuclear policy, for I lack the requisite knowledge to make informed assertions or take action on the matter.

Why did Japan become so deeply invested in nuclear energy?
Why have we continued to operate nuclear power plants without first establishing a final disposal site for nuclear waste?

These are questions that weigh on my mind, but I shall refrain from assigning blame here.

Regarding the meltdown following the Great East Japan Earthquake, I do not intend to condemn TEPCO, nor will I criticise the response of TEPCO and the government in the aftermath of the disaster. The reality is that Japan, complacent in its peace, had never faced an existential threat akin to an attack by Godzilla or an Angel. Until 3.11, our nation had neither the crisis response mechanisms nor the specialised organisations required to address such catastrophes at a governmental level. As a Japanese citizen, I find this regrettable—but it is a fact. Blame and recrimination will not propel us forward. We must tackle these challenges as one nation, united in purpose.

I was among those affected by 3.11, exposed to radiation in the immediate aftermath, and for the past fourteen years, I have continued to live in Fukushima, subjected to low-dose radiation exposure—a reality that will persist.

Is my declining health a consequence of this prolonged exposure?
Did my 81-year-old mother develop breast cancer four years ago due to radiation?

There is no scientific evidence to substantiate such claims, yet the thought lingers in my mind. As an ordinary citizen of Fukushima, I wish to share my thoughts, experiences, and doubts—engaging in discourse with the Fediverse. I want to hear your views.

My wish is singular:
That there shall never be another Fukushima.
That we shall leave no further burdens of this nature to future generations.

I ask you all—lend me your wisdom and strength.

Supported by ChatGPT

Things you should know

The management of Plutonium-239 (Pu-239) at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant necessitates long-term safety measures, given that its half-life is approximately 24,000 years. It is generally understood that radioactive materials reduce to about 1/1000 of their original radioactivity after a period of 10 times their half-life, which in the case of Pu-239 would take approximately 240,000 years.

According to studies from the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), including research on ATOMICA and J-STAGE, the long-term management of Pu-239 is imperative, with methods such as geological disposal envisioned for management periods spanning tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years. This is crucial to minimizing the impact on human living environments, and international standards emphasize the need for meticulous handling of such materials.

The costs associated with the management and disposal of radioactive waste can vary significantly, influenced by the scale of the project, the chosen technology, and the length of the management period. For example, the construction of geological disposal facilities could amount to hundreds of billions to several trillion yen. Long-term management costs, including monitoring and maintenance, may range from several billion to tens of billions of yen annually. Additional costs are incurred for research and development of safer disposal methods, as well as for societal expenses, including efforts to gain local community support.

For context, Finland’s Onkalo geological disposal facility is expected to cost approximately one trillion yen (80 billion euros) for both construction and management. In the case of Fukushima, additional costs related to the accident are anticipated, which could significantly increase the total financial burden.

The treatment of contaminated water at the Fukushima Daiichi plant represents another substantial cost. This includes the construction of purification facilities such as ALPS, which could require hundreds of billions to several trillion yen. The treatment and reprocessing costs are expected to range from several hundred billion to one trillion yen annually. The storage and management of treated water, including long-term monitoring, could also incur hundreds of billions of yen. Furthermore, the development of radiation reduction technologies will add to the financial burden.

If the treatment of contaminated water were to extend over an extraordinarily long period, such as 240,000 years, the cost could reach astronomical figures. For example, assuming an annual expenditure of several hundred billion yen, the total cost could potentially reach several quadrillion yen. However, the actual cost will fluctuate due to technological innovations and changes in the management framework, making it difficult to predict the exact financial requirements.

Thus, the management of contaminated water represents a long-term challenge that could span decades or even centuries. This, along with the management of radioactive waste, presents a major financial hurdle. Consequently, the Japanese government and Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) are working on plans to reduce future costs through technological innovation and policy adjustments, although these plans require ongoing scrutiny and validation.

For information on the half-life and management period of Plutonium-239 (Pu-239), the following references are available:

“Metabolism of Plutonium” (ATOMICA): This document reports that the half-life of Pu-239 is approximately 24,100 years. You can access it at: ATOMICA.JAEA.GO.JP.

“The Use and Safety of Plutonium” (J-Stage): This paper also states that the half-life of Pu-239 is 24,100 years. It can be found at: JSTAGE.JST.GO.JP.

Supported by ChatGPT

Minority Report

“Akko-chan,” my mum, aged 81, schizophrenia, is gradually growing weaker. It may not be today or tomorrow, and probably not even a year from now, but the day of saying “goodbye” is certainly drawing near. The time I can spend with Akko-chan is limited. Since there is so little time left, I want to do whatever I can to show my gratitude and respect. I want her to live out her remaining years peacefully, and I will do whatever it takes to make that happen. I will give it my all.

My mum’s vitality comes from the time she spends with her granddaughters. So, I want to increase that time as much as possible. Perhaps because I don’t have a wife or children, these two nieces are especially dear to me. It’s been 14 years since they evacuated and left Fukushima after the 3.11 disaster. The time my Mum spent with them has been limited. The four years during the pandemic, when they couldn’t meet, was a big blow. Now is the time to recover what was lost during that period.

I’ve decided to think carefully about what I can do for my Mum and nieces and take action. “If I change, the world changes.” I believe in ‘yuishiki.’ Small actions can bring big changes. Time is limited. I will face it with all my effort, doing what I can now, and doing what should be done now. That is the filial piety I can offer and a step forward toward the future.

My family precepts.

1.Cherish your name.
2.Stand by the weak.
3.Consciousness alone: change yourself, change the world.
4.Serve the public, unbound by personal affairs.
5.Recognise that your adversary holds justice with equal fervour.
6.Value the pursuit of understanding the unknown.
7.Resolve matters democratically through discussion; never resort to force.
8.Ensure freedom of speech for democratic organisation.
9.Preserve good traditions; end bad ones in your time.
10.Acquire wisdom to distinguish between what can and cannot be changed.
11.Continue learning until your final breath.
12.Constantly challenge your limits; strengthen mind and body to elevate them.
13.Pursue enlightenment.
14.Preparation is key.
15.Understand your role and fulfil its responsibilities.
16.Single-minded truth: believe solely in truth and uphold it. Proceed with sincere honesty.

Senba-Jiru Recipe (Quick Version)

Senba-Jiru Recipe (Quick Version)

“Semba-jiru is a taste of Osaka’s merchant town, a type of ‘shimatsu no ryouri,’ meaning a frugal and resourceful dish that makes full use of ingredients. This is a classic example of Japan’s humble yet delicious home-cooked cuisine.” It’s cost-effective, full of flavour, and takes less than 30 minutes using canned mackerel and frozen vegetables in the microwave—simple and easy!

Ingredients (Serves 2–3)

  • Canned mackerel (in water) … 1 can (approx. 150g)
  • Frozen spinach … 100g
  • Shimeji mushrooms … 100g (trimmed and separated into small clusters)
  • Frozen chopped spring onions … as needed
  • Still water … 750ml
  • Sake … 2 tbsp
  • Light soy sauce … 2 tbsp
  • Salt … 1/2 tsp (adjust to taste)
  • Optional: Dried seaweed or konjac for added texture and flavour

Instructions

  1. Heating
    Place 750ml of still water, canned mackerel (including the liquid), frozen spinach, frozen chopped spring onions, sake, and shimeji mushrooms in a microwave-safe container. If using dried seaweed or konjac, add them at this stage. Heat in a 500W microwave for 10 minutes.
  2. Seasoning
    After heating, add light soy sauce and salt, stir well, and adjust seasoning if needed.
  3. Serving
    Serve in bowls and enjoy.

Tips

  • Using the liquid from the canned mackerel enhances the umami flavour.
  • Adding shimeji mushrooms enriches the overall taste.
  • Light soy sauce and salt should be added after heating to preserve their flavours.
  • You can enhance the dish by adding dried seaweed or konjac for extra texture and depth.
  • A quick and easy dish, perfect for busy days, taking less than 30 minutes to prepare.

Supported by ChatGPT

Sweet Beans (Lectin-Free & Erythritol-Sweetened)

Pressure Cooker Simmered Sweet Beans

This vibrant and nutritious sweet bean dish is a traditional Japanese recipe, great for a health-conscious diet, fitting the Lectin-Free guidelines by Steven R. Gundry, MD, with lectins reduced by pressure cooking and virtually calorie-free. The pressure cooker was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Ingredients (Serves a Medium Batch)

  • Black beans – 1 cup
  • Kidney beans – 1 cup
  • Aohada beans – 1 cup
  • Still water – approximately 1.5L (enough to submerge the beans by about one index finger’s depth)
  • Erythritol – approximately 200g
  • Soy sauce (gluten-free, additive-free) – 1 tbsp
  • Salt – a pinch

Instructions

  1. Pre-soaking the Beans
    Rinse the black beans, kidney beans, and aohada beans thoroughly. Soak them in plenty of still water for at least 8 hours or overnight.
  2. Scum Removal (Shibukiri)
    Before pressure cooking, perform a quick scum removal (shibukiri) by bringing the beans to a boil in still water, then draining and rinsing them.
    Before pressure cooking, perform a quick scum removal (shibukiri) by bringing the beans to a boil in fresh still water, then draining and rinsing them.
  3. Cooking in the Pressure Cooker
    Drain the soaking still water and place the beans in a pressure cooker with approximately 1.5L of fresh still water (enough to submerge the beans by about one index finger’s depth). Add erythritol gradually, adjusting to taste, along with salt and soy sauce before pressure cooking. Use the accompanying drop lid (otoshibuta) to keep the beans submerged while cooking.
    Pressure cook on high for about 15 minutes.
    Allow the pressure to release naturally. Use the accompanying drop lid (otoshibuta) to keep the beans submerged while cooking.
    pressure cook on high for about 15 minutes.
    Allow the pressure to release naturally.
  4. Resting the Beans
    After pressure cooking, do not open the lid. Let the beans rest overnight to allow the flavors to blend deeply.
  5. Simmering to Concentrate Flavors
    The next day, open the lid and simmer on low heat until the liquid reduces to your preferred consistency. Adjust the flavor by adding more erythritol if needed.

Key Points for a Lectin-Free & Healthy Sweet Bean Dish
Pressure cooking significantly reduces lectins.
Erythritol keeps the sweetness light and calorie-free.
A mix of black beans, kidney beans, and aohada beans provides a variety of textures and flavours.

Supported by ChatGPT